🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.