🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been convicted of uploading sexually explicit scenes from protected movies and television shows on the online site Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement report obtained by media outlets, the unnamed individual shared 347 clips of nude scenes in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then viewed 4.2 million times.

Danish police confirm he has been handed a 7-month deferred sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a rarely-used clause in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by taking the footage out of their original context, the man had harmed the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit clips featuring over 100 female performers.

He shared them in the forum he was a moderator of.

According to the Denmark's copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his online community had more than 6,000 members and participants were encouraged to ask for excerpts of specific performers.

In last year, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the affected actors, filmmakers and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

One actress, among the actresses whose nude scenes were circulated in the community, told Danish media at the period she felt there was a difference between being seen unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress stated the uploads constituted "abuse".

'A significant signal'

The defendant was detained in fall 2024 and pleaded culpable to the allegations recently.

In a comment after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund remarked the decision sent an "significant" message "indicating violations of artists' entitlements has repercussions".

The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its use of the "ethical protections" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an artist's work cannot be utilized in a way which violates their standing.

Intellectual property specialist Dr Alina Trapova informed BBC News the case was "unusual" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them economically.

How the ruling could affect nations abroad is uncertain.

But she added there may be "more and more of these actions" in the future with the growth of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of one's work might be tempered with with greater ease".